Watch this video from the New York times about a shift in men's underwear advertising. They discuss a shift from the hyper-sexualized male ideal to a more relatable guy in underwear advertisements. Have you noticed this shift? I think I've definitely seen a change in some underwear advertising recently. The ads are more quarky and fun and not as much about the sex. But then again look at Andrew Christian; the sex is definitely still out there. The truth is and always has been, sex sells. So sure maybe some companies are switching up underwear ads, but does it work? What sells you (or doesn't sell you) on underwear when you're shopping? Let's get the conversation rolling boys.
Showing posts with label ads. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ads. Show all posts
Saturday, June 01, 2013
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Fruit of the Loom Ad: Rings
Just saw this Fruit of the Loom ad on TV and I have to say I'm unimpressed. Now it's not just because I'm biased against boxers (which I am). Seriously I didn't even know what they were selling. The guy has a great body, but these boxers aren't remotely flattering on him. In fact I didn't even know what they were selling and I certainly didn't realize they were his undies. And now that I realize what they're selling, I certainly don't want it. Do guys actually wear stuff that looks this bad on them and want to look this way?
What are your thoughts on this commercial? Discuss.
Sunday, January 06, 2008
David Beckham's billboard debut

Thursday, February 15, 2007
RIPS and Mensuas deal


Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)